This week I have been

Reading

The 2011 Tour de France race guide.

Watching

An Idiot Abroad

Listening to

The xx

Discovering

(Or rediscovering) Hamlet - Nicki Greenberg's beautiful new version, thanks to the fabulous Snarkattack, who invited me along to see Nicki talk about the creative process behind the book.

Eating

  • An enormous serve of bangers'n'mash and a nourishing pint of Kilkenny at the Town Hall one dismal Tuesday evening.
  • A "Chachi" - chianina meatball sandwich - another brioche donut and some amazing chocolate tart at Beatrix, which Essjay has reviewed.
  • A lazy Sunday lunch at The Crimean. The Polish hunter's stew (bigos) was just the thing to revive me after a chilly bike ride.
  • Generous piles of fried food with oodles of chillies and sichuan peppercorns at Sichuan House
  • Succulent suckling pig at Liberteene.
  • An array of bright, zesty flavours at Chin Chin, where the only problem was having to choose only some of the items from what looks to be a menu that is all hits, no filler.

Links

The Oprah effect

Most of these words are Suzanne Carbone’s, from her “Guess who came to dinner” article in The Age (online – I truly hope it didn’t make it to print).  I also hope it is satirical or, at least, some sort of deranged fantasy.  Unlike Sam Newman and his Footy Show pals, I don’t usually define “satire” as “I’m a talentless goon”, but in this case I am willing to make an exception as the alternative – that it’s for real and has been put in the paper – is too horrendous to consider.

= = = = = = = = = =

I NEVER thought I’d get to read a story called ”The night I met Oprah Winfrey”, but there it was, prominently displayed on the virtual front page of The Age.

Of course, it wasn’t actually called “The night I met Oprah Winfrey” because some enterprising sub decided to go with the headline “Guess who came to dinner in Toorak” to highlight the fact that we really are still stuck in the 60s here.  And not the good 60s, either; the 60s where… well, where people of means are still stuck, which is to say the 50s. Or earlier.

Ten thousand people crammed into Federation Square yesterday to see the TV star for 12 minutes but last night Suzanne Carbone ended up at a private dinner for 20 in Toorak with her and then inflicted her breathless name-dropping recount on innocent newspaper readers some of whom [I wish I could say "most of whom" but I have no real confidence in that assessment] really couldn’t give a rat’s arse about the self-promotions of the rich and exploitative.

Suzanne’s friend Megan Castran always dreamt about Oprah visiting her in Australia – which is a specific and unnervingly limited ambition, when you really think about it – and Suzanne is so starstruck that she can report that “if there’s someone who can make dreams come true, it’s the Big O.”

Mrs Castran met Oprah in Hawaii in 2006 and sat in her Chicago audience the year later. After the show, she gave Oprah her business card and the TV star told her she would call if she was coming to Australia.

Oprah stuck to her word. She told Suzanne last night there was something special about Mrs Castran’s business card. ”There was something about her energy. I kept it in the right-hand side of my desk.”

Mrs Castran has held taco nights at her luxurious home for 20 years and when inviting Suzanne to last night’s dinner, she said it was to celebrate her birthday, which was on Wednesday. Oprah was the icing on the cake.

Mrs Castran, surrounded by devoted husband Paul and children Max and Zoe, had invited 20 close friends including golfer Stuart Appleby and his wife, Ashley Saleet, Natasha Stipanov, Ronnie Atlas, Sarah Walker and Meghan McGann, all people who Suzanne clearly thinks we have heard of and probably hopes we’ll be as breathlessly impressed by as she is.

The doorbell rang at 6pm and Mrs Castran screamed when she saw Oprah. They hugged and Oprah handed over two bottles of tequila, Porfidio and Parfida. Well, it was taco night and tequila shots were in order.

A beaming Mrs Castran, declared: ”This is one of life’s great moments.”  [Suzanne doesn't report that her devoted husband, Paul, rolled his eyes here, but I'd hope he did.]

Dozens of cameramen, sound recordists, producers and PR people from Oprah’s Harpo Productions buzzed around [Dozens!]. Pearl restaurant staff took over the kitchen to prepare canapes and the tacos.

Oprah, wearing jeans and a shirt with her hair expertly blowdried, as usual, [I'm so happy that Fairfax, with it's recent cost-cutting, hasn't dispensed with the services of someone who can spot "expertly blowdried" hair] sat with us outside by the pool and picked up the taco shell with her hands – like the rest of them. Suzanne doesn’t report whether an “Old El Paso” commercial was then filmed, with people discussing the merits of hard shell tacos vs soft, but I can only assume – given the relentless name dropping so far in the article – that it didn’t happen.  They learnt that she sleeps five hours a night. She reiterated that we Aussies are so ”darn friendly”, saying: ”There is a vibrance (sic) and confidence in Australia that I haven’t seen in other places.”  [Suzanne omits to tell us that Oprah was saving her voice and communicating in poorly spelled notes.  Either that, or she is also skilled at picking up spelling mistakes in speech.]

Then she made an announcement. ”Everyone here is coming to Sydney!” There was applause and cheers.

Pastry chef Christopher Montebello from South Melbourne speciality cake shop Let Them Eat Cake made a flourless chocolate cake of Uluru with Oprah sitting on top. Singer Paris Zachariou serenaded Oprah with his own ditty, cheekily called Billionaire.

Mr Castran, who has done well for himself in real estate, joked: ”Anyone who said money can’t buy happiness doesn’t know where to shop.”

Commenting on being wealthy, Oprah said: ”You should try it.”

Oprah asked about Australian values, our lifestyle and even mentioned ”sex”, curious how parents educated their children about the birds and the bees.

Ross Wilson, who came with wife Tania, performed his classic song Eagle Rock and Oprah danced around the pool. Wilson said: ”It can’t get better than that.”

At 7.30pm, Oprah departed with her Uluru cake, pausing on the tennis court to reflect: ”I got to meet real people in a real family setting. That was as good as it can ever get.”

= = = = = = = = = =

Sure, there are tongue-in-cheek elements – the “pausing on the tennis court” to reflect on real people part.  But it all seems to be predicated on the basis that we will recognise the names dropped and will therefore be able to really place it as absurd.  Or maybe that’s just my limited knowledge of a social set that the rest of Melbourne is familiar with…

NYT: getting the intertubes right

Most mainstream media companies seem to have responded to the growth of the internet with fear and loathing.  Newspapers, in particular, have failed to break out of the aesthetic of their page layouts which have traditionally represented hierarchies of newsworthiness. This means that newspapers on the web are newspapers adapted to the medium in a very superficial way, and this is not necessarily reader-friendly.

The New York Times is exploring new ways of reading online, and the Times Skimmer is one of these.  It offers a much better reader experience than the traditional page layout. I also find it easier to browse than the Google Reader format.  As with Reader, you are given the headline and an abstract of the article.  To read the full article, click on it and it opens in the skimmer (ads, embedded videos and all)  The Times Reader is also available for download and has a similar interface to the Skimmer – the download is free and allows access to the front page stories and previews of all stories in the paper; to read the full edition of the paper you must subscribe.  It has a handy “browse” feature, which you can use to flip through the stories and the stories are presented more as they are in a hard copy – columns of text with accompanying images, which are often left out in online versions.

One of the elements of Murdoch’s proposal for paid content that has most riled me is that it hasn’t been presented as anything but a grab for cash; there hasn’t been any discussion on investing in the web to make the content more reader-friendly, the ads less intrusive, or the discussion in the comments better moderated.  What the NYT seems to be doing is demonstrating an understanding that the web and the hard-copy are two distinct media, and showing a willingness to invest in ways of translating the content to best fit the internet.

Twaters

It’s a happy coincidence that combining the words “Twitter” and “haters” results in a variant of the word “Twat”. That was the word I uttered after reading Rebecca Wilson’s column on Twitter today.

Wilson hates Twitter because, unlike “Facebook and blogs (which) appear to serve some useful purpose, Twitter just does not – it is puerile, inane and a shocking waste of time”. Moreover, Twitter users are “vacuous people with too much time on their hands who like to believe we actually care what they are doing”. Wilson has a column where she is paid to spout her own vapid opinions, but she resents the fact that Twitter allows everybody to do the same. She seems particularly peeved that tweets are limited to a character count (she doesn’t seem to be able to settle on whether that count is 140 or 160), although I doubt she’d prefer more extensive “blow-by-blow descriptions” of the “tedium and uselessness” of the lives of people she obviously despises.  (How somebody can be “turgid” within 140 characters is a mystery.)  Perhaps it’s because she can’t summarise her own vacuousness to the form that Twitter is, to her, “the single most hideous technological breakthrough of the past decade” (she’s never tried Microsoft Songsmith, then, but that’s another story).

Continue reading Twaters

The problem of violence, and the non-solutions

Violence is everybody’s problem, according to the Editorial page in Saturday’s Age. Violence might be “everybody’s problem”, but the bigger problem is that the government is currently spinning “everybody’s problem” to mean “everybody’s responsibility” and, in doing so, is avoiding taking any steps to counter it.

The full article is here; below are some items of particular interest to me.

Continue reading The problem of violence, and the non-solutions

Photojournalism from Tehran

The always interesting New York Times “Lens” blog features On Assignment: Covering Tehran, work by Iranian photojournalist Newsha Tavakolian.  The interview is engaging, but it is the images that really speak.

Tehran - Moussavi demonstration

As demonstrations continue in Iran, more information is emerging about the legitimacy of the election, including reports from some districts where voter turnout was greater than 100%.  Protests in support of disenfranchised Iranians continue around the world – #iranelection on Twittersearch is a good place to find local action.

Digital killed the Polaroid star?

Last Monday, the New York Times ran a story about a group of scientists in the Netherlands who are trying to reinvent Polaroid film.  It seemed like a quirky little project and I wondered how many people would be interested beyond the novelty.  Alongside the story, the Times asked readers to send in some of their polaroids.  They were probably expecting a few die-hard polaroid fanatics to submit a couple of photos.  In the end, they received over 900!

Our amazement … soon gave way to grateful and respectful astonishment. The quality of the work was even more impressive than the quantity. Lens readers in this hemisphere, in Europe and in Asia showed an imaginative command of the medium. Their work exploited the idiosyncracies of the Polaroid formats, especially the SX-70 films: the square format, the slightly soft-edged rendition, the occasional defects from the developing process, a color palette that paradoxically seemed warmer than normal but also bent a bit toward blues and greens.

And here they are.  It’s best to look at them in full screen mode.  Amazing!

Oh, no – another whinge about the paper

As a “bonus” with Saturday’s Age, we received a copy of

theage

(melbourne)

magazine

There’s an awful lot to dislike in this shiny, inconveniently sized publication.  Earnest lower case titles, random use of contrasting colours, and enthusiastically misplaced brackets are only a small part of the problem.

Continue reading Oh, no – another whinge about the paper

A tale of two kitties

Actually, two tales of two kitties, but there’s a point beyond which a strained play on a literary reference renders the reference pointless.

Jezebel linked to a story about a couple who were reunited, after a two year period, with their much-loved 20lb Maine Coon cat.

Bob was brought to the local humane society in Minnesota two years after his disappearance and workers found a microchip embedded under his skin with the Meide’s contact information. When they moved they didn’t update their contact information. Workers could not find their new phone number, but eventually thought to search for their names on Facebook. “We love everything about his personality. We love the size, we love big, fat cats,” said Nicole Meide, who first got Bob with her husband after they returned from their honeymoon. She said Bob’s return “brought tears of joy.”

Continue reading A tale of two kitties

Things I hate most about The Sunday Age (and something I like)

Buying the weekend newspapers is nothing more than a habit for me now that the “news” is available online.  It’s a habit I just can’t seem to break, even though they aggravate more than they enlighten me.  The Sunday Age is the worst culprit, with its supplements that skew nauseatingly to the “women’s magazines” end of the market. Usually, I flip through the “Life” and the “M” and rant to my partner.  With him away, I’m reduced to this.  Blogging a whinge.

So, what are the things I hate most?

Continue reading Things I hate most about The Sunday Age (and something I like)

Misanthropy: a side-effect of reading the Herald-Sun

I went through a stage of believing myself to be misanthropic.  I can’t remember why – it just seemed to be that, for a time, I found people to be mostly annoying, at best.  It occurred to me to change my surname to “Anthrope”, but then that would have required abandoning the title “Ms” for “Miss” in order for the name change to achieve any sort of effect.  Also, it would have required then being called “Miss …”, which was unlikely in that phase of my life, and would have been considered eccentric had I insisted upon it.

Continue reading Misanthropy: a side-effect of reading the Herald-Sun

Improve the web with Nofollow Reciprocity.