This week I have been

Reading

The 2011 Tour de France race guide.

Watching

An Idiot Abroad

Listening to

The xx

Discovering

(Or rediscovering) Hamlet - Nicki Greenberg's beautiful new version, thanks to the fabulous Snarkattack, who invited me along to see Nicki talk about the creative process behind the book.

Eating

  • An enormous serve of bangers'n'mash and a nourishing pint of Kilkenny at the Town Hall one dismal Tuesday evening.
  • A "Chachi" - chianina meatball sandwich - another brioche donut and some amazing chocolate tart at Beatrix, which Essjay has reviewed.
  • A lazy Sunday lunch at The Crimean. The Polish hunter's stew (bigos) was just the thing to revive me after a chilly bike ride.
  • Generous piles of fried food with oodles of chillies and sichuan peppercorns at Sichuan House
  • Succulent suckling pig at Liberteene.
  • An array of bright, zesty flavours at Chin Chin, where the only problem was having to choose only some of the items from what looks to be a menu that is all hits, no filler.

Links

The Oprah effect

Most of these words are Suzanne Carbone’s, from her “Guess who came to dinner” article in The Age (online – I truly hope it didn’t make it to print).  I also hope it is satirical or, at least, some sort of deranged fantasy.  Unlike Sam Newman and his Footy Show pals, I don’t usually define “satire” as “I’m a talentless goon”, but in this case I am willing to make an exception as the alternative – that it’s for real and has been put in the paper – is too horrendous to consider.

= = = = = = = = = =

I NEVER thought I’d get to read a story called ”The night I met Oprah Winfrey”, but there it was, prominently displayed on the virtual front page of The Age.

Of course, it wasn’t actually called “The night I met Oprah Winfrey” because some enterprising sub decided to go with the headline “Guess who came to dinner in Toorak” to highlight the fact that we really are still stuck in the 60s here.  And not the good 60s, either; the 60s where… well, where people of means are still stuck, which is to say the 50s. Or earlier.

Ten thousand people crammed into Federation Square yesterday to see the TV star for 12 minutes but last night Suzanne Carbone ended up at a private dinner for 20 in Toorak with her and then inflicted her breathless name-dropping recount on innocent newspaper readers some of whom [I wish I could say "most of whom" but I have no real confidence in that assessment] really couldn’t give a rat’s arse about the self-promotions of the rich and exploitative.

Suzanne’s friend Megan Castran always dreamt about Oprah visiting her in Australia – which is a specific and unnervingly limited ambition, when you really think about it – and Suzanne is so starstruck that she can report that “if there’s someone who can make dreams come true, it’s the Big O.”

Mrs Castran met Oprah in Hawaii in 2006 and sat in her Chicago audience the year later. After the show, she gave Oprah her business card and the TV star told her she would call if she was coming to Australia.

Oprah stuck to her word. She told Suzanne last night there was something special about Mrs Castran’s business card. ”There was something about her energy. I kept it in the right-hand side of my desk.”

Mrs Castran has held taco nights at her luxurious home for 20 years and when inviting Suzanne to last night’s dinner, she said it was to celebrate her birthday, which was on Wednesday. Oprah was the icing on the cake.

Mrs Castran, surrounded by devoted husband Paul and children Max and Zoe, had invited 20 close friends including golfer Stuart Appleby and his wife, Ashley Saleet, Natasha Stipanov, Ronnie Atlas, Sarah Walker and Meghan McGann, all people who Suzanne clearly thinks we have heard of and probably hopes we’ll be as breathlessly impressed by as she is.

The doorbell rang at 6pm and Mrs Castran screamed when she saw Oprah. They hugged and Oprah handed over two bottles of tequila, Porfidio and Parfida. Well, it was taco night and tequila shots were in order.

A beaming Mrs Castran, declared: ”This is one of life’s great moments.”  [Suzanne doesn't report that her devoted husband, Paul, rolled his eyes here, but I'd hope he did.]

Dozens of cameramen, sound recordists, producers and PR people from Oprah’s Harpo Productions buzzed around [Dozens!]. Pearl restaurant staff took over the kitchen to prepare canapes and the tacos.

Oprah, wearing jeans and a shirt with her hair expertly blowdried, as usual, [I'm so happy that Fairfax, with it's recent cost-cutting, hasn't dispensed with the services of someone who can spot "expertly blowdried" hair] sat with us outside by the pool and picked up the taco shell with her hands – like the rest of them. Suzanne doesn’t report whether an “Old El Paso” commercial was then filmed, with people discussing the merits of hard shell tacos vs soft, but I can only assume – given the relentless name dropping so far in the article – that it didn’t happen.  They learnt that she sleeps five hours a night. She reiterated that we Aussies are so ”darn friendly”, saying: ”There is a vibrance (sic) and confidence in Australia that I haven’t seen in other places.”  [Suzanne omits to tell us that Oprah was saving her voice and communicating in poorly spelled notes.  Either that, or she is also skilled at picking up spelling mistakes in speech.]

Then she made an announcement. ”Everyone here is coming to Sydney!” There was applause and cheers.

Pastry chef Christopher Montebello from South Melbourne speciality cake shop Let Them Eat Cake made a flourless chocolate cake of Uluru with Oprah sitting on top. Singer Paris Zachariou serenaded Oprah with his own ditty, cheekily called Billionaire.

Mr Castran, who has done well for himself in real estate, joked: ”Anyone who said money can’t buy happiness doesn’t know where to shop.”

Commenting on being wealthy, Oprah said: ”You should try it.”

Oprah asked about Australian values, our lifestyle and even mentioned ”sex”, curious how parents educated their children about the birds and the bees.

Ross Wilson, who came with wife Tania, performed his classic song Eagle Rock and Oprah danced around the pool. Wilson said: ”It can’t get better than that.”

At 7.30pm, Oprah departed with her Uluru cake, pausing on the tennis court to reflect: ”I got to meet real people in a real family setting. That was as good as it can ever get.”

= = = = = = = = = =

Sure, there are tongue-in-cheek elements – the “pausing on the tennis court” to reflect on real people part.  But it all seems to be predicated on the basis that we will recognise the names dropped and will therefore be able to really place it as absurd.  Or maybe that’s just my limited knowledge of a social set that the rest of Melbourne is familiar with…

Did I say you could print that?

News Ltd has a complicated relationship with the internet.  On one hand, they seem to view bloggers and tweeters as news parasites, stealing their hard-won, quality content for snarky posts.  And then there’s Google, aggregating news so that we freeloaders can read it without annoying popup ads.  In order to stop this online anarchy, Rupert Murdoch proposes charging for access to News’ online content:

Quality journalism is not cheap. The digital revolution has opened many new and inexpensive distribution channels but it has not made content free. We intend to charge for all our news websites.

Did he say “quality journalism”?  I would pay for quality journalism, however I don’t see much evidence of that in Murdoch’s publications.  In fact, I don’t see much of it in local papers – printed or online – at all.  If Fairfax joins News in charging for online access, I’ll be no less informed than I currently am.  I’ll continue to get my news from the ABC, the BBC, the Guardian and the New York Times.  If the non-government news providers join in and start charging for access, I might consider paying for the Guardian and the NYT.  Would I miss out on local news?  No, the ABC has it covered.

But this is old news, I hear you say.  Why’s she banging on about this now?  Well, there’s the “other hand”, the one that News likes to bite, but still expects to receive food from.  A couple of weeks ago, during the exciting days of the Liberal party leadership meltdown, #spill on Twitter was a vital source of gossip and updates.  What quality content did the Herald-Sun come up with for it’s online coverage?  They pulled a bunch of tweets and published them.  How do I know this, when I scrupulously avoid reading the Hun these days?  I received this from a fellow tweeter:

I see you got quotes on the Herald-Sun website in their Abbott-Twitter story!

Yep.  One line from a long twitter exchange with @teacoffeetea was taken out of context and dumped in a Hun story.  The fact that it didn’t make sense in isolation only further illustrates the Hun’s limited understanding of the medium.  And, as much as I like to think that my observations are all gold, pure gold, I’d be hoping for more if I were to pay for the content.

Settling in

I feel as though I’ve been drifting for a while here1 with no real purpose. Part of that I’m going to attribute to seasonal motivational fluctuations (I’m sure that’s a thing), but that can’t be the whole of it. For a (very brief) moment I was considering participating in NaBloPoMo (a post a day, all month – the bloggers’ equivalent to NaNoWriMo2) – a bit of discipline might be handy, even in recreation – but the moment passed. Even as I hovered my mouse over the sign-up button, though, I knew that doing it would result in half a dozen desultory posts of this nature, and then back to random intermittence. That’s defined as lose-lose, whichever way you look at it.

Perhaps that’s why I decided to move the blog – a [virtual] change is as good as a [virtual] holiday? Except that… a [virtual] holiday is about as refreshing as you’d expect it to be.

So, this is all by way of saying: a new address hasn’t magically jump-started my motivation to write. In lieu of being refreshing and original, then, I’m going to rant about Larissa Dubecki’s latest restaurant review to save you the frustration of having to read it.

More, after the jump (which is after the footnotes).

= = = = = = =

1. “Here” is a vague concept, of course. I’ve only just come here, but… well, you know what I mean.

2. Unlike NaNoWriMo, however, NaBloPoMo happens every month, so I’ve got a chance to not do it twelve times a year.

Continue reading Settling in

Twaters

It’s a happy coincidence that combining the words “Twitter” and “haters” results in a variant of the word “Twat”. That was the word I uttered after reading Rebecca Wilson’s column on Twitter today.

Wilson hates Twitter because, unlike “Facebook and blogs (which) appear to serve some useful purpose, Twitter just does not – it is puerile, inane and a shocking waste of time”. Moreover, Twitter users are “vacuous people with too much time on their hands who like to believe we actually care what they are doing”. Wilson has a column where she is paid to spout her own vapid opinions, but she resents the fact that Twitter allows everybody to do the same. She seems particularly peeved that tweets are limited to a character count (she doesn’t seem to be able to settle on whether that count is 140 or 160), although I doubt she’d prefer more extensive “blow-by-blow descriptions” of the “tedium and uselessness” of the lives of people she obviously despises.  (How somebody can be “turgid” within 140 characters is a mystery.)  Perhaps it’s because she can’t summarise her own vacuousness to the form that Twitter is, to her, “the single most hideous technological breakthrough of the past decade” (she’s never tried Microsoft Songsmith, then, but that’s another story).

Continue reading Twaters

Oh, no – another whinge about the paper

As a “bonus” with Saturday’s Age, we received a copy of

theage

(melbourne)

magazine

There’s an awful lot to dislike in this shiny, inconveniently sized publication.  Earnest lower case titles, random use of contrasting colours, and enthusiastically misplaced brackets are only a small part of the problem.

Continue reading Oh, no – another whinge about the paper

Things I hate most about The Sunday Age (and something I like)

Buying the weekend newspapers is nothing more than a habit for me now that the “news” is available online.  It’s a habit I just can’t seem to break, even though they aggravate more than they enlighten me.  The Sunday Age is the worst culprit, with its supplements that skew nauseatingly to the “women’s magazines” end of the market. Usually, I flip through the “Life” and the “M” and rant to my partner.  With him away, I’m reduced to this.  Blogging a whinge.

So, what are the things I hate most?

Continue reading Things I hate most about The Sunday Age (and something I like)